![](https://static1.squarespace.com/static/597136b0ff7c5064f2c70dc2/t/59765e97f951af665f10d409/1500929687538/1000w/)
As I continue scanning some of my earlier journals, I am often struck by how empty some of the pages feel. I hadn't really gotten into the type of layering that I do now, and I was much more linear in my way of working. As I was scanning, I even skipped many pages that just were not complete, and I only scanned pages that felt rather developed.
![](https://static1.squarespace.com/static/597136b0ff7c5064f2c70dc2/t/59765e97f951af665f10d40b/1500929687538/1000w/)
These are three scans from journal number 2 including the cover. Both two-page spreads here are very light - very high key. Although the space is pretty much filled from edge to edge, they still feel rather empty - rather simplistic.
![](https://static1.squarespace.com/static/597136b0ff7c5064f2c70dc2/t/59765e97f951af665f10d40d/1500929687538/1000w/)
Now I tend to work and rework pages jumping around in my journal adding random things. I tend to go back and fill the space more, and I add more and more layers creating richer and richer documents. But to be honest, I don't know if one is better than the other. There's something that I like about the simplicity.